Gastroenterology diseases
like Crohn disease remains a challenging clinical entity, both medically and
surgically. It frequently presents in early adulthood and imposes a lifetime
exposure to chronic inflammation that can affect the entire gastrointestinal
tract.
Approximately 70 to 90%
of the patients with Crohn disease will ultimately require surgery. There is no definitive
cure for Crohn disease and surgery is reserved for failed medical therapy or
the complications of the disease, namely, obstruction, septic complications and
fistulas.
In fact, laparoscopic
surgery offers many advantages, which are particularly beneficial to this
subset of patients, such as fewer wound complications, a shortened hospital
course, less tissue trauma and subsequent adhesion formation, and earlier
resumption of oral intake and bowel function.
Ileocolic inflammation is
the most common pattern of disease in Crohn disease. Laparoscopic surgery for
small bowel Crohn disease is safe and feasible but did not impart a definitive
advantage over open surgery. Specifically, there are no statistical significant
differences in rates of wound infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection,
anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal abscess, duration of hospital stays, or
reoperation for disease recurrence.
Hand-assisted
laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has gained considerable acceptance as a practical
alternative to traditional laparoscopic surgery, HALS results in similar
clinical outcomes as compared with standard laparoscopy. HALS provides tactile
feedback and the ability for adequate retraction that may be beneficial in this
subset of patients due to the inflammation, thickened mesentery, the potential
for abscesses and fistulas, and bulky specimens that may not be appropriate for
standard laparoscopy.
Single-Incision
Laparoscopic Surgery has become increasingly used in a variety of colorectal
procedures, including inflammatory bowel disease. Hence, Laparoscopy offers
excellent short- and long-term outcomes like conventional open surgery.
Although operative times are generally longer in a laparoscopic approach, there
are well-established benefits in improved cosmesis, quicker return of bowel
function, and shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopy is also possible in recurrent
disease and confers similar benefits to primary resections.
No comments:
Post a Comment